"It has nothing to do with interpretations or semantics or meanings."

Communication has everything to do with interpretation, sematics and meanings.

---------------------------------------------

I should have made myself clearer.

I meant to say that my point about holy writs has nothing to do with the process of communications such as semantics and interpretations and meanings.

I am not reasoning about "communication".

I am not reasoning about "writing".

I am reasoning about the fact that humans communicated/related (BY WHATEVER PROCESS) before writing. Thus humans had an overstanding of Jah and righteousness and morality and humanity before holy writs came about.

I did not mean to turn this into a discussion about communication itself.

thanks for the input