Honour

Leprosy and albinism are not the same thing. I don't know if you have ever seen a leper but I have seen several. They are not uniformly de-pigmented and, over time, the disease also causes parts of thier body to fall off. Also, leprosy while being contagious, is not hereditary. So, unless the theory of 'whites' being descended from a colony of African lepers can show how only a selective and later all-encompassing symptom became hard-wired into the genetic code, the theory is conjecture.

And, there is the matter of the Innuit, now, as far as I know, they have lived in iced up regions for thousands of years. Are there any records of blond, blue eyed Innuit? Any red-headed Innuit? And, why do they have flat noses? Why have thier noses not 'adapted' to breathe the thinner air at the bottom of the Earth?

In my opinion, there has been nothing shown to disprove the word that says 'whites' are a mixed 'race' (i.e. that they are descended from African mothers and neanderthal fathers). There was a post a while back by Karibkween that spoke on links between neanderthals and 'whites'. Now, even though I have a lot of respect for Dr Welsing, I am allowed to disagree with her and I do not accept the theory regarding the descent of 'whites'. It imples that 'whites' are of 100% African descent (i.e African father and mother). No. Unless it can be proven that neanderthals are an African species, this cannot be right.

Do you have proof that 'whites' are not related to neanderthals?