Honour

Yes, certainly there are things we will hear that will shake up what we thought we knew as facts. However, to speak about the misjudgement of outsiders and the detrimental effects that misjudgement had (and still has) on Africans, a misjudgement which was based among other things on ARROGANCE, is not the same as implying that what Africans have endured at the hands of invaders was justified.

Think about it : The 'white' according to this 'brother' was the first to endure an imposed holocoast (this 'brother' even used the word maafa to describe this alleged enforced migration). The poor 'white' then suffered for how many millenia as a result of African's 'arrogance, ignorance etc.'. Now, if any of this is true, should'nt the Africans themselves then be prepared to suffer for as many millenia? Would such suffering then not be in fact justified? If this so-called theory is true, then 'whites' are in actuality a saintly species. How else would you describe them? They have met up with those who cast thier ancestors into the icy bottom of the Earth and all they did was enslave them for a few centuries, colonise thier lands for a few decades, take a few hectares here and there, and institute minor incidents of economic bondage. What is all that compared to 40,000 years of living in ice caves dogding sabre tooth tigers and wolves?

I see what this theory is devised for and so I reject it. Who does'nt like my way of doing this should get back up the backside of the dog he crawled out of this morning. He should return there and bark from there as the echoing effects will make his rubbish sound more interesting. Also, ones witnessing the miracle of a pooch talking out of it's yansh may not notice what a hypocrite this person is.

I asked the other one to present his evidence, remember that when I spoke about show-offs inviting trouble, I backed up what I said with accounts of ancestors like Mansa Musa entering the history books of semites and 'whites' by going on pilgrimages to mecca with tons of gold. I also asked why the priests of Kemet shared thier knowledge with a people they already knew had no good intentions.

I have asked for similar proof of what he asserts, has he responded yet? No, he will return to what Africans have done TO EACH OTHER as his proof for the alleged expulsion of 'adam' from his homeland.

This line of thought is no different from that held by ones who are still blaming Africans for AIDS.