|
"yes, in india, the indigenous black populations were conquered by the northern euro-asians called aryans at the same time that hebrews or hyksos was invading africa. why is it acceptable that aryans invaded india but hebrew/hyksos did not invade kemet or that the 'peoples of the sea' were not invading africa. just the "wanderings" of chosen peoples? "
* I know that there were various attempts and then successive conquerings of Khemet by "miserable Asiatics." Since I know the Exodus story is older than this though - and can be found amongst indigenous African peoples, I am not even convinced that the Exodus as a historical event even happened. So therefore, I am not convinced that the Exodus as told in the bible is the story of the Hyksos invading and co-opting Egyptian culture.
"iyah360, the term 'middle east' is a recent discription of zionist occupied palestine and its surrounding arab states."
* Yes I know it is a misleading term, I just used it because it is a well known term for the discussion.
"iyah360, you know that by the end of the pliestocene, the overwhelming majority of inhabitants of the southern hemisphere was classified as non'white' although albinos are birth all of the time by those same non'whites'."
* I am not convinced that "albinos" were kicked out of Africa as you have proposed in various posts. I know human beings adapt based on the environment they are in.
"iyah360, the habasha from southern arabia could be as indo-european as colin powell. you know of the caste system and it is still alive in whole indian ocean area as well as sudan,nigeria or jamaica. yes, non'white' people are still functioning tools of white pseudo-supremacy. even on this board."
* I overs the point you are trying to get at. I do believe that the Israelite story in its more original form(the allegorical one from the Nile Valley Civilizations, pre-biblical) was not about a chosen ethnic race of people who are destined to rule the world at the expense of everyone else.
I do not think Rastafari should be advocating this either - especially when taking into account the various words of Haile Selassie which spoke of human co-operation and not domination.
"iyah360, is it that hard to see that white supremacist black converts are the ones who brought the semetic language with them which developed into ge-ez?"
* i'm not sure it is as, pardon the pun, "black and white" as you make it seem. I think it is very hard to deliniate between the contributions of "indo-europeans" and those of indigenous Ethiopians in Abyssinia, ESPECIALLY when one I-siders the similirities between Nile Valley and Mesopotamian civilizations. I will agree that both were started by Black people and were eventually co-opted by invading northerners.
freedomisahapislave
![]() FAIR USE NOTICE: This site may at times contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml |