|
thanks for the information. i have seen some of it before. no doubt that the Amhara have some Southern Arabian lineage.
Fact is though - how do we know exactly that Geez and Amharic do not have a more ancient African root? The Ethiopians(including Abyssinia) have been migrating to and from Africa for a long long time - DNA evidence shows that even those with admixture of "Arabian" blood still have some of the oldest bloodline known today. Ethiopia has also been trading with many areas including the "middle east" and India for a long long time -there is naturally some cultural diffusion that occurs with this. with that in mind - the language cannot be simply described as the result of "indo-european" conquerors. i overs your point though - i hope you see where i am coming from.
"You note that Akkadian is the oldest Semitic language.
Actually, it's the oldest RECORDED Semitic language. There would have
been Semitic languages before it, but we don't know what they were because
we have no written records. And even Proto-Semitic, the parent language
of Semitic, would have to traced back further to Proto-Afro-Asiatic to
find ITS parent language. As you can see, the task is difficult; in fact,
it goes beyond what comparative linguistics can do at this time. That's
why no one knows the origin of African languages."
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site may at times contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml |