*****So, when Marcus Garvey said that we shouldnt mix with the european, it had a semitic tone to it to you? *****
absolutely. garvey was as colonized as the next man. see, we must realize that the entire western society is a semitic colony. europe was the first colony of semitic thought when the catholic/xtian con-versions were implemented and displaced the poly/panentheistic worldview of 'pagans'. They brought that mindset to every area in "the new world" (everywhere they have conquered). But the mindset was not originated but adopted by the euros...from who?
Yes i do recall the meaning of "asiatic" which actually comtradicts the premise here because asia denotes the UNITY of afrika, the orient and europe (the hemisphere...not separated by oceans).
Racial purity doctrine is man-made, reactive and protective but not natural/divine...just as holy-writs and male-gendered supreme beings are.
Bro. Noble, today we have the ability to access a consciousness (information/truth/overstanding) that allows us to transcend the levels of our previous teachings and doctrines of antiquity. We know that eclipses are not angry dragons and that floods are not divine punishments. We can analyze and identify the flaws of Drew Ali and Akenaton and Kung'fucius and Garvey and Socrates and Nietzsche and Constantine and HIM and Elijah Muhammad and King and Marx and Freud and Darwin, etc...
Let us meditate upon a natural/universe vibration and we should sight that racial purity is a construct ONLY amongst those who fear genetic annihilation. The afrikan/asiatic has NEVER and will never feel genetic annihilation unless he adopts a semitic propaganda/mindset.
Semites, being oddballs/separatists from the rest of the indigenous populous, implemented racial purity (upon the europeans) to cause them to fear afrikans hence deflecting attention away from the REAL separatists, them. Even in the motherland, all we see are their texts that describe how they were better than everyone else and how evil/lost/cursed everyone else were.
What european philosophy shared that same view pre-semitically? none.
For instance, nazi racial purity philosophy is semitic in basis and NOT ancient european nor afrikan. (I can EASILY elaborate/prove)
If you sight racial purity as an ancient overstanding, I bet that the source or the 'ism' that promotes it is semitically aligned or influenced/tampered, one way or another.
Let us remember that pre-semitic europe has more in common with the orient and afrika than either has in common with the semite/hebrew.
Fast forward to today where a (9-11 justified, semitically manipulated US) is engaging against China and seeking to exploit Afrika.
The semites have ALWAYS caused unrest amongst the 'asiatics'. Today is no different.
-give thankhs for the appetite
FAIR USE NOTICE:
This site may at times contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml