| AfricaSpeaks | Howcomyoucom | RaceandHistory | RootsWomen | Trinicenter |
 |
 |
 |
| RELATED LINKS | COMMUNITY | REASONING FORUM | CHAT ROOM | ARCHIVES |
|
| Photo Gallery | About Us | Terms of Use | Register/Create a Profile |
There is no such thing as a Ible during the times you speak of. What there was were loose books that were not united into one book form as of yet. The bible comes from the Greek word meaning biblos, simply meaning book.
The Ible that you have today has come via a collection of books chosen by the council of Nicea. However what is stoping InI from reading the books that were left out?
The scriptures say that InI are free men in Yeshua". Therefore InI can research what InI like. Who is stoping the I's from reading whatever book that was left out? I have read them all.
And I would not put too much stock into the whole ROMAN thing. Now a days whites can be rastas, and people are arguing that Babylonians have verute as now. So why not accept the ROMANS?
 FAIR USE NOTICE: This site may at times contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml |