Misinterpretations or not, the main point I would like to get across is that the scenario presented by the prosecution has NO evidence that stands up to scrutiny to back it up, and in fact ALL evidence points to the scenario presented by the prosecution being, not only ill-supported by evidence, but actually IMPOSSIBLE. This is leaving aside the issue of whether or not Mumia shot the cop (which, again, I believe he did not... but that is leaving that aside and just talking about the prosecution's argument as to how he supposedly shot the cop).
Look it up for yourself, do the research.
FAIR USE NOTICE:
This site may at times contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml