Let me try to succinctly explain my sights.
First, we may need to look at the word "semite" not from the popular shem origins but from the origin of semi as in "half" or "incomplete", like a semi-circle.
If we take that perspective, it is very clear that via monotheism as presented, we have only half-truths...180 degrees. In order to keep people out of the know, you must hijack the basis of overstanding. By suppressing our ability to acknowledge and affirm femininity, which is another way of saying 'grasping the entirety of truth', we must look somewhere for the completion that we instinctly know should be completed.
The first trick is establishing "semitism" as a particular nation or people instead of a man-dictated religious version of reality. If we see through the parameters that is concocted for us via the "victim of holocausts and persecutions" card and look at the fact that semitism is an ideology, we will clearly sight that semi-thinking via the indoctrination of semi-truths, i.e. Father over Mother, IS INDEED THE ROOT OF CIVILIZATION'S FAILURES AND FOLLY. Like I have claimed many times, hierarchy is the folly and hierarchy ONLY comes from monotheistic thought.
MONOTHEISM = SEMITISM
See, what we are doing is falling into the same egocentric mindset as the Greeks and Romans and Europeans who felt that THEIR expansions and borders covered the ENTIRE WORLD. And we do just that when we declare Abraham as patriarch...or we declare Adam and Eve as original humans. By accepting those presentations, we absorb a semitic (half-truth) mindset.
Again, we are not talking about a race here. That is bogus. We are talking about an ideology...a universe-view and a flawed one at that. We are talking about the convincing (converting) of ones from the communion of Nature to the belief in specialism by the choice of a jealous and angry and authoritative vendetta type male God.
Although an emotional God depiction is not original to semitic theory (nothing is original to semitism), it cannot be fully overstood when you remove the feminine/shekinah attributes.
I apologize for the length of this but what I am trying to convey is that Semitism is actually a code-word for “civilization” in general. If you look at the history of what is considered the beginnings of civilization, you will see hierarchy and you will see this hierarchy associated with a human male pinnacle.
Case and point is what we can still see in remote areas of the world. Wherever we see the most peaceful and natural abiding humans, we categorize them as “uncivilized”. And the etymology of civil basically means CONGESTED within the confines of a “city”.
Thus it is no mystery that PAGANS are “country dwellers” and HEATHENS are “those who live in the heaths (wilderness). These people were considered uncivilized, which they were but the CONNOTATION of being uncivilized cast an inferior and demonized stigma on those people.
This is where there is debate and confusion regarding Ethiopia, whereas on one hand it is considered the cradle of civilization and on the other hand we can see the earliest examples of the folly of civilization as well...yet there are much older peoples in Afrika that live a so-called "savage" lifestyle but do not harm fleas...or could sight/sense the vibrations of Sirius.
So to answer your question, SEMITISM refers to the ideology of “man having dominion over” anything or anyone compared to “living in harmony amongst”.
You will see that human aggression and the establishment of empires typically resulted from expansive and migratory behavior which needed the aggressions/strengths of males.
In other words, conclusion is that both Semitism and Wholism are older than the holy writs allude to. The holy writs are propaganda to pedestal and sanctify a certain people who refined and adhered to said ideology.
What is 6,000 years when man has walked Earth for 100,000. Thus when we speak of New World Order, we have to see that Semitism as refined by holy writs ushered in the Ages with the assignment of prophets for each age.
New World Order = One God = One government = monotheism = semitism
New Age is a code-word for semitic paradigm shifts as dictated by the controllers of semitic philosophy. How did the Pygmys change their lifestyles when we entered Pisces? How is it changing as we enter Aquarius?
Just look at the hardcore history. Monotheism is a semitic construct used to exploit our instinctive “as above so below” overstanding in order to claim absolute rulership over humans...over EVERYTHING.
"Dominion over" is not a European concept. It is Semitic. European tribes watched stars and venerated the Earth and Sun as proven by Beltane and Oester and other cyclical acknowledgments.
So-called "judaism" spread INTO Europe not FROM Europe. What does that tell you???
So-called "islam" spread INTO Europe not FROM Europe...same with Christianity. And then we have the "it came from Afrika" card. Where in Afrika did either of the BIG 3 religions originate, as worshiped???
Original south american, north american, samoan, aborigine, aleutian, guinean universe-view was PAGAN.
Original Afrikan universe-view was PAGAN.
Original European universe-view was PAGAN, not monotheistic.
SEMI means INCOMPLETE
The WORST thing that could happen to a certain group of people is for whites to renounce and reverse their indoctrinated supremacy mindsets and come to a TRUE peace and harmony with blacks. WHO WOULD THAT SCARE THE HELL OUT OF???
ANY BELIEF THAT POSITS A SUPREME HEAVENLY FATHER ONLY, IS HALF-TRUE...IS SEMI-TIC.
(and that is self-explanatory...where is the other parent???)
Identify for me the European origin of the mindset that Afrikans (or any humans) are sub-human animals fit to be treated like cattle. Which particular tribe is that from, the Celts, the Balts, the Scots, the Saxons, the Scandinavians, WHICH ONE???
The Nazi mindset did not come from Aryan nor Germanic tribes' lifestyle. So where the hell did it come from???
THIS IS TABOO!!!
FAIR USE NOTICE:
This site may at times contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml