*******the bush administration pretty much opened the flood gates for basically a blank check for these interests - interests which should be known are NOT necessarily those of the everyday israeli, just like alot of what the u.s. government does is not in the interest of its citizens(although it may mask it that way)*******
But empires have ALWAYS conveyed the claim of being in the best interests of the supporters/dependents/accomplices. Israeli and American SAFETY and COMFORT is the psychological politrick that fuels the machine. The Bush regime was the last appointee in the entire scene. Now we have a non-threatening smiling ice-cream man.
*******sweetheart u.s. government deals like halliburton and bechtel were probably equally matched with similar deals with israeli companies.*******
360, I am trying to give the benefit of the doubt that we are not being somewhat protective and/or naive here. The scope of israeli involvement within American affairs (including the Cosa Nostra-Mafia) goes way beyond military and politics and sweetheart deal...and a long time before some Bush term.
My question remains, when was there NOT impactful jewish involvement in any facet of the US or Western Civilization as a whole?
Look how often ones point out the Masonic/Skull and Bone membership of leaders such as Gore and Bush and Kerry. Look how often ones point out the Boule membership of Cosby and Jesse. But rarely do you ever blatantly hear of the jewish membership of controllers in Hollywood/entertainment or any of the other "9 areas of human behavior" . That is because it is TABOO to make mention of it. Why?
I am not making the blanket statement that “(no names please) run everything” but I cannot think of one area where WASP males have absolute exclusivity except for perhaps a country club or two. Can you?
Just as I stand by the fact that Obamism is causing black COMPLICITY in the cesspool of babylon, I also stand by the fact that with as much jewish involvement, influence and impact in ALL areas of American society, it is time to ask if there is not only complicity, which is not disputable, but is there origination.
There is absolutely NO PROOF of racism, as defined as implementations targeted SPECIFICALLY towards ones of different races solely because of their different race, until the 1700s. Upper echelons of secret societies were not ignorant of their Afrikan/Feminine foundation. They kept it SECRET. It was important for the development of the white egotistical individual democracy-yearning mind for the notion of supremacy, even for the lowest folks, to be instilled.
Democracy was the crack cocaine epidemic of the 1700s which caused Europeans to steal from their own mothers...MOTHER Afrika.
Democracy, like crack to cocaine, is enhanced/altered judeo-xtianity.
Rumor has it that Columbus’s helmsman was an Afrikan. Was he enslaved?
Moors state how they had citizenship and even owned slaves. How, since they were black?
It goes back to my previous statement that racism is only a fairly recently implementation in the CLASS categorizations by the elites. There used to be aristocrats and paupers. To give the paupers (the "unwashed" low-class masses) some kind of status and to get them to comply with the democratic experiment, an even lower sub-class had to be excavated. No one was beneath a pauper until the "nigger" was created and introduced as a facet within society. The nigger (a systematic culturally and spiritually destroyed Afrikan) was created in order to give nobodies some egotistical status. Let us recall the "democracy" requires a previously unheard inflation of individuality/ego. So this new democracy was to the paupers as Obama is to black and white people today...to get them COMPLICIT instead of defiant and resistant. Today's sub-low-class is the Mexican 'illegal' that is ALLOWED over the border. If they blamed 9-11 on Mexican, would that be happening?
Both blacks and whites see Obama as a symbol of THEIR OWN rising from nothingness (remember, KRSTic transcendance is instinctive so the controllers know how to manipulate our reactions/alignments...but without challenging the arrangements nor implementations.
Just as long as we are on board.
Just as long as we shine for the world.
A smiling, dancing, partying negro and a non-spooky black leader is the best advertisement for global psychological input.
It MUST be OK. Even a BLACK is president. Even another FEMALE is secretary of state.
Its the same false "high" ones chase from drug usage.
...nothing new under the sun.
But back to Europe...we can see that the European masses were given a carrot. By whom and for what purpose is the question?
Europeans created the State of Israel, right?
Who created the “state” of white/male supremacy (whiteness)?
Was not the exclusive, separatist, supremacist, chosenist MANIFEST DESTINY mindset already possessed by groups of people BEFORE Europe was even homogenized via catholicism/xtianity?
SOMEONE TURNED OUT EUROPE.
The power of UNITY is an OMNIPOTENT truth. So as white Europe was gaining strength, a common enemy had to be created...a boogey man had to create uneasiness and FEAR...and additionally, a common mindset had to be instilled into the European psyche. That notion was none other than the monotheistic, Abrahamic, Judeo-Christian religious imperial institution, so powerful that even with a split by those protesting (Protestants) certain activities, it still remained a galvanizing/cohesive force during the Age of Expansion (known as the World War against everyone else)
The concocted boogey-man was not only those that looked different but those of DIFFERENT BELIEF-SYSTEMS. Be it slavics. chinese, indians, american indians, polynesians, aborigines or the afrikan, the AWARENESS and FEAR of complexion and culture/religion differences was INDOCTRINATED into the psyches of white europeans.
AWARENESS AND FOCUSING ON DIFFERENCES!
The Popes called the shots...or did they? They still answered to canon from the New and OLD Testaments of the Judeo-Christian Biblioteca.
How did Europeans transition from trading in Timbuktu, studying at the feet of Afrikan thinkers in Kemet and interbreeding with Moors to shooting noses off of Sphinxes and chopping scrotums off of Afrikan men???
WHAT INITIALIZED THIS CHANGE?
It is within the analysis of this transition that we will find an ugly/taboo/forbidden answer.
You cite Zoroastrianism. OKIE DOKIE, I will roll with that (*wink*). Because what is for sure is at some point, by someone, Europeans were INDOCTRINATED with their worldview because nothing about white/male supremacy is new to them nor was it necessary BEFORE European homogenization.
Pagan/heathen europeans were NOT racist. Early monotheics had no problem with a BLACK Madonna.
Europeans did NOT "create" the concept of racism nor did they originate slavery...not chattel slavery.
So my question is WHEN and BY WHOM was racist thought and classism and slavery introduced to the Europeans???
When there were Baltics and Celts and Welsh and Scots and Germanics and Francos and Normans, there was NO racism towards, nor slavery against Afrikans.
The best way to deflect hostilities towards you is to concoct an enemy of your enemy. That takes the heat off your back.
WHO IS DOING THE CONCOCTING?
WHO IS THE REAL BOSS?
FAIR USE NOTICE:
This site may at times contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml