Seshata, greetings...

So, I've read this several times now...

"the most destructive act committed by white supremacists against non-white people*

*sexual intercourse, 'sexual play', and/or sexual confusion

explanation:

next to white supremacy (racism) itself, 'sexual activity' is the second strongest motivating force among the people of the known universe.

the persons who have dominat functional control or influence over the sexual expressions and/or desires of the other persons[animals, ets.], also have dominant control over the basic motivations of those same persons in other areas of expression, including economics, education, entertainment, labor, law, politics, religion and war.

any white person, who engages in sexual intercourse with a non-white person, under conditions dominated by white supremace, has done more to promote the maintenance, expansion, and/or refinement of white supremacy, than he or she could have done by any other means, in any other area of activity. this is also true when a white person, under conditions dominated by white supremacy, commits a countersexual act [so-called 'homosexual' act] wit/against a non-white person. anything that a white person says or does that helps to promote such behavior, and/or anything that a white person says or does that helps to promote sexual confusion of any kind, among non-white people, is, by so doing, practicing racism in it's most destructive form. "

I'm at a point where I feel like I need a better explanation. Do individual circumstances not come into play? Frankly, a lot of "white" people aren't consciously thinking about how "conditions are dominated by white supremacy" when they engage in a sexual act with a non white person, and certainly vice versa as well. So, two people have sex, and then go their seperate ways, there are more destructive forces at work no? To reproduce is perhaps the one true instinct that human (i known you don't like the word usage, "people" or whatever you choose) beings posess. As you've pointed out, white supremacy is a fairly recent construct, how can you see it as a stronger motivator than sexual activity? I'm also curious, after reading a different post in another thread as to how you figure white supremacy was created by "people", I think it was, but you put out this idea that only the Creator has made something out of nothing and therefore all of peoples' ideas were then traced to the creator, did I get that right, and is that really how you see things? Surely the Creator did not intend for life to be this way...I might argue that "ye are as Gods" meant we too have the power to make something out of nothing, for better or for worse. Your thoughts? I appreciate it the reasoning...

Selam