*******According to some sources. Musevi is involved in crimes against humanity and is compliant with Western interests in his region, yet he wrote an excellent piece of literature that would seem anti-thetical to his actions. Not sure what you are not getting about what I said. *******

Because of your interjection, the topic of analyzing the actions of Khadafi becomes lost in the concern about the author.

That's called a shill...a filibuster...a diversion tactic in the world of politricks.

The issue of Khadafi has been spun into a questioning of the author's credibility.