what i was saying was why entertain the author's resume when he presented truth (or not).

Too often a truth that Farakhan or even Gingrich/Limbaugh or some other polarizing character says is lost in our opinion of the person.

The topic is the evil of Khadafi (or not) in the context that the mighty righteous US feels justified in sending bombs and CIA operatives to his land.

I simply asked you for an opinion of what was covered in the article instead of analyzing the author.

If Hitler said the sun rose in the east, a jew would still have to acknowledge it.

We are being manipulated every day by our sensitivity to the packaging instead of the truth that the box may contain.

If a bomb is falling and someone says GET DOWN, we would be better served to get down than to put our hands on our hips and ask the person who the hell they think they're talking to.