|
peace and hotep,
discipleofthenile, your hostility is unbecoming. by this example, you are not concerned withe the essence of this thread. one minds listen to this:
"why the resistance?
Posted By: discipleofthenile
Date: Friday, 18 August 2006, at 11:06 p.m.
In Response To: Re: Skin tone more important for African Americans (seshatasefekht)
greetings seshata7 sefekht7:
******* isn't the title of this thread misleading*******
well, I was hoping you would convey just how the title was misleading.
but anyway, why the resistance to accept the reality of dark-skin downpression. I mean do you actually sight the 'colorism' claims as absolute bunk? "
members of this board , is discipleofthenile correct in this assessment or am i being mis-characterize for what ever reason:
"why the resistance to accept the reality of dark-skin downpression. I mean do you actually sight the 'colorism' claims as absolute bunk?--discipleofthenile".
i would only be just if discipleofthenile backs up this assertion. else this is beyond reasoning a ploy......
freedomisahapislave
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site may at times contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml |