I did not put the article to show there is no common ancestor. I know we all share a common ancestry.

I placed the article to emphasize the point that the Mitochondrial Eve findings related to “our most-recent common ancestor” and not “our most ancient common ancestry”, therefore using it to support the 'biblical eve' which I suspect means our most ancient ancestry is incorrect as far as that particular scientific report is concerned. You may have to present another report to prove your point if you are addressing our most ancient common ancestors.

It will be nice in the future if you could leave room for other comments rather than post several times, thereby blocking responses to a particular point.

You asked me a question on another thread and I responded and there were no more responses from you to me although you responded to others on the same thread. That could be an oversight.

Do you support the theory of evolution?