Yeah.Truth is truth but it is still individual.I guess anti 'so and so' would be saying 'youre an idiot(inferior),you dont get,or accept my point of veiw',but just saying,'this is what I veiw as truth and if you see it then cool,if not,cool'is different,if this is what you are talking about,then yeah,Iam in no 'question of' anti-so and so.

I think that if a person maybe saw God/universal force,and its possibility to manefest in the form of a man and they only related that experience of God as in the form of a man,then that would be a problem.
I think that saying that god is ONLY in the form of one male 'entity' and could not and cannot be 'found',experienced in the form of a female 'entity' is where the syndrome/delineation from the feminine could and has occured.Isnt because Religion is big business,run by men that the reason why they have to exclusivise or stream line their 'package' into 'one male god' system is to maintain control?Thats what youre saying I think.

I spose if they had a polytheistic model for world system control,they would find it hard to,as males,to keep control cos women would be able to challenge them by saying 'yes but Isis is an equal god to the other male gods so I have as much right to do x y z'.The intuitive nature of some women would be able to see through their tricks and unsustainable directions and this would not work.I gonna think more about this.

Respect for the response.Bless...