|
Photo Gallery | About Us | Terms of Use | Register/Create a Profile |
Why do they always include Africa's occupied territories in the total African population, then use a photo of a Rich-Black-Negroid African farmer and land owner as evidence of run away population growth?
If we exclude the Asiatics or Semites that have invaded and now occupy large territories of North and East Africa, not to mention the Germanic population of Southern Africa, it becomes quite clear that native Africans aren't nearly as responsible for the global population explosion as the Asiatic and judging from its projected growth; Europe.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site may at times contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml |