Did anyone else see the Discovery Science channel's latest installment on the Neanderthal? The crusade to re-invent nature's most destructive humanoid, before the purveyors of an evolutionary "linear supremacy" can lay claim to their true ancestor, is in full swing.

If we are one human race, why the need for ancient Afara-Akans to describe their homeland/territory as the "land of the Blacks?"

What visible differences was Herodotus alluding to when he claimed Phrygians to be anterior to Egyptians?

Does it surprise anyone that Neanderthal fossils have been recovered at all points of entry into the "Land of the Blacks?"

Or does it surprise anyone that these communual points are now overwhelmingly populated by Semites?

Is there any legitimate argument out there, that says these previously "Black" territories were won by anything but the shedding of copious amounts of Black-Afarakan Blood?

The first evidence of war (+/)genocide exists on rocks in a corner of Brazil called terra del fuego, it is dated to a time after the last ice-age, when the floodgates opened presenting unlimited access to the Black lands of the south, by the cold adapted humanoid of the north.

The need for Afarakans to recognize and appreciate their differences, is vital to their ultimate survival, not some specious claim to racial superiority.

According to G.H. Massey there was one ancient culture/religion/way of being/living; this same culture we now call by many names; Anu, Ani, Aainu, Mauri/Maori, Samauri/Samurai, Tau/Tao, Ausarian, Sumerian, etc. It has also been established that all subsequent "cultures" were founded on the ancient/original. What should be obvious and is often overlooked is that nothing good has come from "Black" surrender and "White" appropriation of the original.