no, it is not genetics unless you discount the words of the Majesty:

"...Afrikans, no more and no less than other men, possess all human attributes, talents and deficiencies, virtues and faults…”****

let me emphasize

NO MORE, NO LESS

wait, i must do it again

NO MORE, NO LESS

in case thick minds reading don't get this.

no more, no less = equal

or in other words one might say that people, within the same circumsatnces WILL HAVE LIKENED BEHAVIORS ACCORDING TO THEIR SITUATION

Sometimes i am amazed that the glaring truth is so speculative

sometimes people never see that spirit is not dependant on genes. they just cannot see

consider this: if their be such a thing as "superior genes" what the hell good is it for ? i mean the "superior" Aryans did some weird murderous shit, but oh, look at the congo right now! sexual violence against women?!?! raping women in front of their husbands before murdering them... particularly cruel, wouldn"t you say???

so did their genetic code halt them from the genecidal atrocities they commit (in the name of war)????????

c'mon

you rasta queen said you suppose there is a good arguement for both (genetic vs. culture). STOP PAYING UNDUE RESPECT TO FLESH

There is NO good arguemnent for genetic blah blah

the arguement is actually ridiculous.

AND here's an example of the confusion, that whites will discount the genetic arguement of inferiority but claim it when it serves, ala Bob Marley (half white must have added to his superb ability)

that's not a cut down to one group; it is not only whites that do this don't cha know -

forward