So this is an opinion about how nature works based on a religious text, and despite scientific evidence to the contrary that would show that homosexual sexual playfulness exists in other species throughout the animal kingdom - your question was not really a question to begin with (Any Other Creatures Are Sodomites Away From Human?) . . .or maybe it was - the answer would be "no" because nature does not conform to our manmade religious dogmatic descriptions. Sodom is a place with a specific relevance to a specific religious belief system. As Karibkween has pointed out that the utility of not having homosexual intercourse is different than whether or not it is "wrong or right" in the eyes of the creator(which really is now, and always has been imbued with our own projections or what right and wrong is). To not eat pork and to not have homosexual relations(taboos) may have relevance(at the time of the bible) to multiply the tribe, for health reasons, etc. and some of those things likely still exist today(per Karibkween's lengthy reasonings about microorganisms that exist in pigs, and in certain parts of the human anatomy, etc.)

I have posted about this topic before . . . sexual orientation IMO is equal parts sociological and biological. Sociological in the fact that trends do catch on and that there is really (no separation between "the mind and the environment - KRS-ONE"). Biological because science has shown that there are certain biological factors that are different in homosexual people than heterosexual. And also I am of the opinion that increase in environmental pollutants in our air, water and food have a direct effect on our biology which includes our biological sexual orientation. Plastics, soy, hormones, chemicals, pharmaceuticals all have documented effects on testosterone and estrogen levels in humans. I think the increase in biological tendencies towards homosexuality has these variables to be partially to blame.