|
Photo Gallery | About Us | Terms of Use | Register/Create a Profile |
"China was granted MFN status despite its human rights infractions because it was expedient for America's Multi-National billionaires."
* So is it based on diplomacy or expediency/opportunism? Did China not concede some of it's supposed ideology in order to be the sweatshop for 1st world capitalists? I guess that's where I'm a little confused - as diplomacy alone would not of gotten China into it's economic position alone - and I'm not sure where one draws the line between what exists based on diplomacy vs globalist economic opportunism.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site may at times contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml |