|
Of course you know you are lying here. You attempted to distort again for the umpteenth time.
You have a history of being hostile and offensive around any topic I engage, especially around the issues of Colorism. You can spin it anyway you want and play passive/aggressive. You use the same old hostility toward I. Your only intention is to mislead when engaging these issues. You were the one claiming this topic is redundant.
You may be able to fool others with your 'new' innocence to hostility (passive/aggressive) approach, but not I. You routinely share your hostility (through mock innocence) to anything being presented or in agreement with the issues we deem important to engage. You seem to have no problem with the crap silly Whites post on this board. You rarely challenge that, just our responses to it.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site may at times contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml |