|
Masimba,
It is not advocacy FOR anarchy, rather AGAINST dogma.
For what purpose do we receive the revolutionary instruction to Love, if it is to create oppression with a different face? It is the nature of man and woman to seek freedom and autonomy; and conversely, to wrap themselves up in rules and boundaries. It is the nature of Jah to free us from these shackles forever. But if people feel more secure with dogma rather than in HIM, how is that honor?
Why cast off one set of shackles to replace them with another?
I feel the bredren has asked members here to think, to question, to discuss.....in the spirit of love. Tell then, how is that an offense?
For my part, I do not put writs and rites above love. There is comfort in rules and boundaries, but the rule of love is greater, and more discomfiting
Naphti
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site may at times contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml |