|
Peace
Emotions are overstood. Having no control of them are not. There should be a way to reason without resulting to insults. When a person is not trying to reason but be a smart donkey, I overstand the frustration.
I am going to say that the tirade was unnecessary. If Seshata had thrown insults, then I could sight the need of retaliation. But when a person is not insulting another, why do ones have to go there?
Disagree with the reasoning is fine. Are there otherways to handle disagreements than insults?
What is the "you" people crap?
I guess certain ones want a "we" vs "dem" debate now?
Ones need to read the post by Baba Marcus.
People need to stop thinking their shyt dont stink and that they are the only ones who can have sound reasonings.
Talk about arrogance and ignorance.
I dont know much about Welsing's albino theory so I chose not to say much about it.
If nothing can be added to the reasonings, including constructive criticism, then agree to disagree.
Dont throw insults.
This is all that this site has become. Insults and destructive reasonings...
We have lost valued contributors because of it.
I guess ones will be happier to sit and post to each other.
Then there could be no disagreement.
![]() FAIR USE NOTICE: This site may at times contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml |