I have explained before that especially the anthroplogical concept 'negro' is very racist, because it refers to a people that has never created no civilization; all civilizatons in Africa have been created by Hammites, brown Mediterraneans, Semites, semi-Hammites, Elongates, and even Caucasoids. That's what it really means in the anthroplogical sense! They have made us believe 'negro' means black, but in reality it means UNCIVILIZED! You get it?
White colonial anthropologists want to make us believe those 'negroes' and 'negroids' have always been the slaves or at least subordinates of the Hammites, Semites, semi-Hammite, Caucasoids, etc., in other words most anthropologists don't really know what a 'negro' was, but what they did know is they called all black people were 'negroes' in the social sense, but in the anthroplogical sense only those peoples who had never created no civilization (according to their standards) were called 'negroes', thus bringing confusion to those black people who were digging up their history. So 'negro' is just a racist trick, a racist anthropological concept, got it?
It's gona take bravery to stop (mental) slavery!
FAIR USE NOTICE:
This site may at times contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml