HTP, Greetings to the Collective! Long READ...PLEASE STAY WITH IT TILL THE END!
Believe me I AM NOT TRYNG TO START A FIRE, BUT CHECK THIS - I would like to clearly signify to the reader that my intentions here are NOT to disgrace ANY belief. I consider that a relgious "belief is a personal affair and depends on choices that we make according to our environmental realities. We should recognize that the "world" evolves, and the human consciousness appears to be affected by social transformations.
The origin of the word "god" until the Mediterranean word "deai", before the phonetic aspect disappears in the word "neter" of the language of Pharaohs of the Nile Valley. The word "deai" is literally defined as the mother of maize, maybe to signify that the concept of a higher power is a foce or essential fluid of life through the fact that she allows the reproduction of nutritional plants like maize. At this level, one can already see a difference between the concpt of "god" and deai". The definition of "neter" has survived TILL THE PRESENT TIME. "Neter" is defined as a fluid that covers the universe and knows no borders. It surrounds the world and every element of the world. It surrounds an object and every element of the object. "NETER' fills space, whether thisspace appears empty or full. The concept of "neter" can be found in modern science under the name of ether, with almost the exact definition and almost the same letters. "Neter" and "deai" have one fact in common: they can be considered as titles or common names for some type of entities, whether they are universal or local. It is very important to notice that these two words that are considered ancestors to the modern word "god", have always represented a clear concept. The concept of "neter" and "deai" do not represent a problem to the existential aspect of a human being, becasue at every scale, these nmes or titles define entities that are waiting to be specifically called by their names. Consequently, their names are also a symbol of our recognition of what they are and what they are not. This can be understood as a proof of our capapbilities to distinguish what they do from what they do not do, and their place in the universe as creatted or creator entities. It is human nature to get confused and lost in chaotic and disordered environments. Our way of affirming our presence is our tendency to rationalize and put order in our surroundings.
The idea of a world created by the Gods has a lot more arguments in its favor. If we accept the idea that the Gods (Neteru) have created us, we are affirming that we have organized and heirarcharized them so that our consciousness could exist in the universe of cosmic forces. The psychological calm for the human being is the space creatted by the order in us. It is the egg of the world composed of diverse elements; this egg could only give life if the order among the elements is preserved. If we shake the egg biforously, the components inside thie philosophical egg get mixed up and the egg becomes rotten and is destined to destruction.
Our way of preserving creation will be to intorduce the characteristics of our basic nature to the world; the concept of order. Let us take a look at the path followed by the evolution of concepts that have stimulated our actions and explained our lack of action. Can we base our actions of today on what we want to become tomorrow? If yes, what type of future are we constructing in the present that is entirely based on social ideologies? Social motivations are nothing but the will that we have to create an impact on each other.
NONE OF THE MONOTHESIS DOCTRINES HAVE GIVEN A SATISFYING DEFINITION TO EITHER THE CONCEPT OF CREATION OR THE IDEA OF DEATH AND RESURRECTION. The universe, as presented in the BOOK OF THE DEAD, is composed of four principle elements that are created by the first trinity (Ra, Amon, an dPtah). This concept is a lot more human than the concept of a complex world, such as the one we live in and have not yet finished discovering, having been created by a "unique god". It is almost like saying that one can identify the subject of an action without knowing what is the action itself, or like identifying an inventor without knowing his invention. The idea of finding a creator of an unlimited CREATION IS CLOSE TO BEING RIDICULOUS.
MEANWHILE, ONE SHOULD RECOGNIZE THAT MONOTHEISM CAPITALIZED ON TEH 'Belief" of the follower 9MEANING HIS EMOTIONAL SIDE0. But the FACT is that these doctrines do NOT recognize the most important base of the human psychological nature on which his subconscious relies: LOGIC. Existence is too complex to be entirely created by a lone divinity! This is why the ideas of trinities and creative enneads are coninuosly haunting the human species.
When individuals consistently answer questions based on faith, they are denying the orderliness of the Supreme Creator AND "Helpers" if you will. When ones and ones consistently say we cannot OVERSTAND things since "our minds are not that of A God".....
FAIR USE NOTICE:
This site may at times contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml