AfricaSpeaks Howcomyoucom RaceandHistory RootsWomen Trinicenter RELATED LINKS INTERACTIVE REASONING FORUM CHAT ROOM ARCHIVES

Facts or fiction.nothing new under the SUN.

Posted By: Ras Howard Henry
Date: Sunday, 2 October 2011, at 9:26 a.m.

WHAT IS THE TRUE MEANING OF TERM,NOTHING IS NEW UNDER THE SUN?
IF IN FACT IT SUGGESTS THERE ARE NO INTRODUCTIONS SINCE THE CREATION OF THE EARTH,THEN WHY WOULD/SHOULD WE QUESTION THE THINGS THAT ARE HAPPENNING.

WHY WOULD ONE ASK ABOUT THE REASONS OF ONES DWELLING IN WHAT IS DESCRIBED AS corruption OR ONES WHO FIGHT AGAINST SUCH,WAS CREATION CREATED FOR ONES TO EYEDENTIFY OPPRESSIONS WHILE OTHERS CANNOT?

IF CREATION IS CREATED BY ONE OBJECT AS IN the labeled god,HOW CAN WE SEPARATE THINGS LABELED AS RIGHT OR WRONG GOOD OR bad FROM SUCH creator?
SINCE THE CREATOR ACCORDING TO, GAVE EVERYONE THEIR OWN MIND MEANING ONE CAN CONTROLS THE THOUGHTS OF THEIR MIND, WHY IS IT ALL CANNOT HOLD TO THE THOUGHTS OF LIVING IN ONE LOVE AND HARMONY WITH THE OTHER REGARDLESS OF DEEDS?

WAS CREATION CREATED TO FIGHT AGAINST ITSELF?
IF NOTHING IS NEW UNDER THE SUN HOW CAN THINGS BE OF A LEARNING PROCESS INSTEAD OF A REMINDING LEVELS?
IF NOTHING IS NEW UNDER THE SUN HOW CAN WE HAVE OLD AND NEW AND NOT TERM THOSE HAPPENNINGS AS A RECYCLING PROJECT,SHOULD RECYCLED PRODUCTIONS TERM AS NEW?

IF ALL WE SEE TODAY IN IT'S MODERNITY CAN BE PLACE UNDER THE UMBRELLA OF NOTHING IS NEW UNDER THE SUN THEN I THINK THE WORD CREATION NEEDS TO BE MORE LOOKED INTO BECAUSE ITS CAUSING BIG PROBLEMS FOR THE OUT OF babby-lon box THINKERS.

Messages In This Thread

Facts or fiction.nothing new under the SUN.
Ras Howard Henry -- Sunday, 2 October 2011, at 9:26 a.m.

Re: Facts or fiction.nothing new under the SUN.
karibkween -- Saturday, 8 October 2011, at 12:17 p.m.

Re: Facts or fiction.nothing new under the SUN.
Ras Howard Henry -- Saturday, 8 October 2011, at 7:55 p.m.

Re: Facts or fiction.nothing new under the SUN.
Ras Howard Henry -- Saturday, 8 October 2011, at 8:02 p.m.

facts may be fiction or non-fiction
seshatasefekht -- Saturday, 8 October 2011, at 8:52 p.m.

Re: facts may be fiction or non-fiction
Ras Howard Henry -- Saturday, 8 October 2011, at 11:12 p.m.

Re: facts may be fiction or non-fiction *LINK*
seshatasefekht -- Sunday, 9 October 2011, at 10:23 a.m.

Re: facts may be fiction or non-fiction *LINK*
seshatasefekht -- Sunday, 9 October 2011, at 10:44 a.m.

Re: facts may be fiction or non-fiction
Ras Howard Henry -- Sunday, 9 October 2011, at 12:41 p.m.

Re: facts may be fiction or non-fiction
seshatasefekht -- Sunday, 9 October 2011, at 1:28 p.m.

Re: facts may be fiction or non-fiction
Ras Howard Henry -- Sunday, 9 October 2011, at 3:25 p.m.

Re: facts may be fiction or non-fiction
seshatasefekht -- Sunday, 9 October 2011, at 3:51 p.m.

Re: facts may be fiction or non-fiction
Ras Howard Henry -- Sunday, 9 October 2011, at 4:22 p.m.

Re: facts may be fiction or non-fiction
seshatasefekht -- Sunday, 9 October 2011, at 4:46 p.m.

Re: facts may be fiction or non-fiction
Ras Howard Henry -- Sunday, 9 October 2011, at 4:56 p.m.

Re: facts may be fiction or non-fiction
seshatasefekht -- Sunday, 9 October 2011, at 5:07 p.m.

Re: facts may be fiction or non-fiction
Ras Howard Henry -- Sunday, 9 October 2011, at 5:20 p.m.

Re: facts may be fiction or non-fiction
Ras Howard Henry -- Sunday, 9 October 2011, at 12:34 p.m.

Re: facts may be fiction or non-fiction
seshatasefekht -- Sunday, 9 October 2011, at 1:19 p.m.

Re: facts may be fiction or non-fiction
Ras Howard Henry -- Sunday, 9 October 2011, at 4:06 p.m.

Re: facts may be fiction or non-fiction
seshatasefekht -- Sunday, 9 October 2011, at 4:54 p.m.

Re: facts may be fiction or non-fiction
Ras Howard Henry -- Sunday, 9 October 2011, at 5:03 p.m.

Re: facts may be fiction or non-fiction
seshatasefekht -- Sunday, 9 October 2011, at 5:16 p.m.

Re: facts may be fiction or non-fiction
Ras Howard Henry -- Sunday, 9 October 2011, at 5:25 p.m.

is this concept hard to under/inner/overstand *LINK*
seshatasefekht -- Sunday, 9 October 2011, at 12:15 p.m.

Surveilling INFILTRATING discrediting DISRUPTING
seshatasefekht -- Sunday, 9 October 2011, at 12:42 p.m.

"domestic political organizations"
seshatasefekht -- Sunday, 9 October 2011, at 12:50 p.m.

Re: "domestic political organizations"
Ras Howard Henry -- Sunday, 9 October 2011, at 7:45 p.m.

Re: "domestic political organizations"
seshatasefekht -- Sunday, 9 October 2011, at 9:02 p.m.

Re: "domestic political organizations"
Ras Howard Henry -- Monday, 10 October 2011, at 1:32 p.m.

Re: "domestic political organizations"
seshatasefekht -- Monday, 10 October 2011, at 3:06 p.m.

Re: "domestic political organizations"
Ras Howard Henry -- Tuesday, 11 October 2011, at 12:21 a.m.

Re: "domestic political organizations"
seshatasefekht -- Tuesday, 11 October 2011, at 1:33 a.m.

Re: "domestic political organizations"
Ras Howard Henry -- Tuesday, 11 October 2011, at 10:29 p.m.

Re: is this concept hard to under/inner/overstand
Ras Howard Henry -- Sunday, 9 October 2011, at 1:26 p.m.

Re: is this concept hard to under/inner/overstand
seshatasefekht -- Sunday, 9 October 2011, at 1:42 p.m.

Re: is this concept hard to under/inner/overstand
Ras Howard Henry -- Sunday, 9 October 2011, at 5:09 p.m.