Posted By: discipleofmaat In Response To: Re: Correction... (Noble Ras Heru)
Date: Monday, 27 July 2009, at 9:31 a.m.
In Response To: Re: Correction... (Noble Ras Heru)
********In the Qabalah, this world (not just our earth) is called 'ASSIAH'. Take away one S & the H and you have your word. I actually think i explained it perfectly and find no contradictions therein my good man/brother.*******
I cannot dispute ka’b’allah information. I must accept your statement.
*******Male-Gendered supreme beings is correct to a degree, becuz arent you a 'male'? and god-like? Thats y i say its correct to a degree, and becuz this paragraph seems long i will hold peace til' further notice from you.********
So are my mothers, sisters and daughters. But ALL I am instilled with is male supremacy which is directly attributed to divine male presentations. To be technical, nature shows feminine superiority but it is not of domination, control and rule. Males con-FUSED the two (superiority and control).
********However, as i stated before, you are dealing with the PHYSICAL reasoning ie. that which we can see with our eyes. For example, if u see a person with dark-skin, and looking like the "average" brother or sister, you most of the time would say they are "black" or of african descent, and this the european does not want to see cuz like you said "genetic annihilation".*******
But why are we fussing over THEIR perspectives and mindsets? Remember, we are discussing the ancients’ point of view that preceded them.
*******But the focus changes when we are dealing with the META-physical and spiritual understanding. Becuz that same person who has dark-skin, couldve had a european father, and becuz the father was european (the man being the life giver ie. sperm), the child even if dominated by "black" genes will have NO spirit. ******
Oh come on. All I ask is your basis/proof of that statement. I guarantee you that is semitic thought. Remember, the europeans say the same about “afrikan savages” and the semites (ALL OF THEM: xtian/jew/moslem alike) say the same about “gentiles” and other outsiders/infidels as well. This is separatist philosophy. Separatist philosophy ONLY results from fear of annihilation. Please show me when the Afrikan/Asiatic ever had fear of annihilation. The pagan pre-xtian european did not have this fear neither until encountering the semite who instilled conquer-by-division tactics against their adversaries. It is clear of the semitic mindset by the way and reasons why they transitioned from poly/pan-theic divinity structure to a mono-theistic one thus subduing the “shekina”.
Remember, white supremacy and fear of a black planet grew in direct proportions to semitic acceptances by euros. Even the Greek Empire had no fear of blacks and blackness. But I do recall a Song of Solomon or Psalm that says "I am darkened by the sun yet still beautiful" Why "yet still" beautiful as if a curse?
We have to overstand that we are following what those who detached themselves from Ma’at/Her LAND (Earth) followed. That is not indigenous overstanding. It is indeed constructed for protectionism/survival within a threat.
That is the difference in why indigenous from all over the globe WELCOMED this strange european visitor and did not simply massacre them on the shores. No fear. No worry. "here mr. european visitor, have some food". We had no idea what they were capable of because WE had no ideas of being capable of such actions ourselves. We overstood the masculine thought when in time of war or hunting but MY GOD not ALL THE FRIGGIN TIME to such magnitude permeating all areas of human behavior. Talk about terrorism...
In other words, Europeans are "frankenstein monsters" of semitic philosophy...semitic crackheads and power-chasers. The first semitic lesson was the instillation of male supremacy. But euro/pagans observed and venerated feminine goddesses thus this translated into their physical actions. Again, ras, show me the origination of euro deviant behavior and I show you a semite in the vicinity.
This is where the performer "Madonna" holds such significance to white folk and defiance of the (semitic frontrunner) Catholic church philosophy. She said "papa don't preach but I made up my mind that I keeping my baby". Although the catholic church was against abortion, they still were very active in hiding 'unwanted' pregnancies. Although the child was not aborted, it was still detached from its mother. (symbolically representative of the semitic detachment from mother earth)
You cannot tell me that there is proof that a European mother did not share the same life-force with her child...no different from an Afrikan mother...no difference from an animal for that matter.
Now if you hold the view that europeans are “mad-scientist” creations, then we will have a hard time harmonizing. But if you sight that euros are simply migratory descendants of Afrikans then we may be able to.
*******Isciple, this "Race Purity" concept IS NEW, but the ORIGINAL PRINCIPLES of the said concept had roots that were grown from BEFORE many different shades of "races" came into being.*******
Then how could there be warning/prohibition of something that did not exist?
******Those stories that we all heard about in the holy-writs are SYMBOLIC and come from said concept, eventho it could have been maniupulated through the sights of men. Im dealing with the SPIRITUAL THEN PHYSICAL overstanding brother isciple....INNER-MAN THEN OUTER-MAN (no word play here).*******
I overstand the word “meta-physical”. We are talking about the medium/transition between physical and spiritual. But again, all I seek is the NATURAL evidence/proof to support these claims. Again, we are in a position to gauge ancient teachings against our information that can reconnect the twins of science and spirituality into their rightful whole. I still seek this evidence from you.
********AHHH, but this is what i think Marcus Garvey was trying to get at, if you read the Philosophies and Opinions of the said. Not only 'semites', but mixed people who brandished their in-between skin-color for the prupose of going on both sides (asiatic and european) whenever they feel for the benefits, are all in the SAME boat. In Garveys time, he called them the "New Race", eventho it is still much complicated than the semitical agenda, which seemed to be spiritual but was materialistc. I am in NO WAY dis-respecting our mixed borthers & sisters, but i ask you to look @ the history. If u read Graveys' opinions of why we shouldnt race mix, then i think u can better elaborate on what he was wrong about (i dont think u elaborated on it or maybe i read lazy?)*******
Garvey agreed with the KKK. Which means he agreed with the Jews also. Like I said, it is semitic fear indoctrination. Afrikans (those asiatics who reside in Afrika) have no fear of annihilation. In fact, what IS natural is the way our children are having offspring. But they call it premarital promiscuity. But when Netjer made me hunger the female at 14, I think society is a bit screwy when I should wait until 21. IT IS SOCIETY THAT IS MESSED UP, NOT A TEENAGER’S SEX DRIVE. It is a natural reaction of creatures to increase their offspring production when there is a threat...but not to issue edicts and prohibitions and fear-tactics from an “angry/spooky God”. The semites know full well that we must be massacred in order to deplete us. And they also know what our spirituality is capable of (even though we don’t). So they have us killing each other and putting AIDs in the mix (the reason for AIDs is to create fear of procreation. You cannot die of Aids with a condom so they say...and you cannot procreate neither).
*******Becuz you do/did have europeans who were try to stay within the folds of nature and lived amongst their own peacefully...until the semitic understandings came along....hmmmmm*******
absolutely. The true enemy is pulling the strings of the grotesque marionette.
*******The ONLY semitically tampering, is the LITERAL understanding of the biblical stories that came from elder troditions.*******
I disagree. Too many biblical presentations (dealing with humans) are social-political in basis rather than dealing with harmony in nature. The bible is reactive and protective of evil deeds by diabolical controllers. It reeks of someone who is homophobic for instance and yaps about killing homos in the name of God and all because they loath/fear the homosexuality within themselves. The bible conveys hatred and resentment of others and fear of God rather than overstanding the inner-divinity. It castrates our divinity and gives the power to the sky...and more significantly to unproven representatives called prophets, kings, judges, messiahs, etc.
*******What is ur understanding of a semite again? Is a semite a mental thing or physical? Then i can answer ur question.*******
Semite is semi...half. It is appropriate because semites have made the DE-CISIONS to sever the combined genders of divinity into male and female, has pedestaled the male and discarded the female and taken it for granted. According to dictionaries, pagans are anyone who is NOT xtian, moslem or jew. WOW, that leaves a whole lot of people in a whole lot of territory across the globe. Yet these folks are considered lessor or ignorant of God and laws and such. That’s a tough dosage to swallow, isn’t it.
There is no mystery that semitic philosophy can be identified by the TAKING of lands. This because there is no basis of land being PROVIDED by God so you must become God (a resentful one) and conquer. It is completely masculine/linear thought that proves an absence of feminine overstanding. (or at least the feminine overstanding had to be eliminated to galvanize the tribes for survival/defense reasons. (again, back to my original response) It can be easily psychologically analyzed as some type of "deprivation complex".
Semitic thought is COMPLETELY FOREIGN and unique to the rest of the planet. Let us use all of the human civilizations COMBINED as our litmus test and not just the Abrahamic mafia.
---ok, how about that for a full course meal
Messages In This Thread
Rastafari Speaks is maintained by Administrator with RastafariSpeaks.com 5.12.
FAIR USE NOTICE:
This site may at times contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml