You are correct that nature does not support producing children via same sax couples, nor is such an idea scientific. Even science can not produce children of same sex couples. Therefore that is very clear indeed.

However when gays have sex, they are not doing it with the intention to produce offspring. If they are honest, they will tell you that they are doing it for the mere pleasure of it. In other words lust!

That is why I asked, "SHOULD INI DISMISS ANY SEXUAL ACTS IF THOSE ACTS ARE NOT PERFORMED WITH THE SOLE PURPOSE OF PRODUCING CHILDREN"?

If we are to deny gays and lesbians their sexual practises, then also we have to deny heterosexuals who have sex out of lust as well. In other words we have to be honest with ourselves. If I'm to be honest with myself, I must admitt that as a wombman, I have had sex with my kingman just for the mere pleasure of it and the feeling.

So exactly where do INI draw the line?

As far as Sodom and Gomarah, there was more to their destruction than the attmepted violation of those 2 angels. Keep in mind that God already decided to destroy S&G prior to the angels ever entering into S&G.

I have confirmed studies concerning S&G (Sodom & Gomarah). What I found out was that the city, just as God said was purely evil indeed! I will give you one of the occurances I learned of in my independent studies.

A man was beaten in his head and robbed in S&G, until his skull was cracked and the blood flowed from his head. When the man reported this to the authorities, they ordered the man who was robbed to pay the the thief a fee for his services!!! The judge ruled that the theif was performing surgery on his head by cracking it open, thus the man who was bleeding from his head had to pay the man who robbed him a fee for his services.

There are several more stories in S&G that details their wickedness. If God was to destroy every city where he found homosexuality, there would not be any cities left.

INI must be careful that the reasoning do not develop into homophobia. When that happens, hatred and misoverstandings begin to run rampant.

If we are to be homophobic, then why not be xeonophobic? After all no homo ever called me N**ger, or no homo ever enslaved me, and no homo ever sold my children to another while I watched helpless from an auction block, and no homo ever made me sleep with a man I didn't love, just to make him rich by breeding children for massa, and no homo every threw me overboard a slave ship, because they ran out of food to feed me, or decided that the slave import tax would be more than they had originally estimated!

I can make a better argument for my children to fear white folks, more so than I can make an argument for them to fear gays.

The last I checked, very few Rastas are xeonophobic anymore. But many are homophobic.

An example of an xeonophobic Rasta would be Ras Leonard Howell. But many Rastas are no ashamed of Howell, because they see his exonophobia as being outdated.

Personally, I would not want my children to grow up gay. I say that because, I do not want them to grow up and have to face homophobia, due to violence towards gays. However the main reason is because I want some "GRAND BABBIES" someday LOL

Did you ever take a minuet to notice, that through our history, we as Africans in diaspora has hated everything that our slave master's have hated, with the exception of himself.

We as a people are mostly DEMOCRATS in babylon /babylondon, when it was the REPUBLICANS who actually freed us. Why??? Because the DEMOCRATIC PARTY was the party of our slave master's.

Thats is why I orifginnaly asked you, if this was a moral issue to you aka religious, or is this purely a nature aka scientific issue to you?

If anything, we Rastas are the bringers of light to the world, and not the other way around.

Personally, I must examine any hatred or phobias that we have learned from our oppressors.

IF FEAR IN ANY FORM DID NOT EXIST IN AFRICA, THEN IT MUST HAVE BEEN IMPOSSESED UPON US FROM INVADERS AND HUMAN TRAFFICERS!!!