Let me see if I can make this clear...
Everything is either/or, this/that, black/white for you isn't it? Just like you are supposedly against all "technology" (vaguely defined). In my opinion what I said was perfectly clear. But let me see if I can make it absolutely pellucidly crystal clear for ya. There is a big protest planned for May 4th in Brighton, focused against the arms trade (ITT/EDO is a company with a branch near Brighton which produces some of the weapons components used by the Isralien army amongst others). The organisers are publicising the date, time, place to meet, how to get there etc. But those amongst the organisers who may be planning extra-legal direct actions (I say "extra-legal" not "illegal" cos it's the got-damned government that is "illegal" in my book) are discussing those plans only with their close associates who they trust. What's unclear about that? What doesn't make sense about that?
And yeah I know your "close associate who you trust" might be an informer, but those are the risks of the game.
PS just to be clear for any feds, snoops etc reading this, there are no plans for any *violent* action on May 4th, other than by the police, who always plan violent action any time people attempt to exercise their so called "democratic right" to peacefully protest.