HomepageHowcomyoucomRaceandHistoryRootsWomenTrinicenter
Homepage
Rastafari Speaks Archive
Buy Books
ARCHIVE HOMEMESSAGE BOARDREASONING FORUMARTICLESARCHIVES

Read Only : Rastafari Speaks Reasoning Archives

[ View Thread ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

Re: Make sense (if you can)

Posted By: rasi
Date: Thursday, 30 March 2006, at 6:14 p.m.

In Response To: Re: Make sense (if you can) (Eja)

you asked this:

Why did you repost the bit about nigeria?

In my response to you, I said nothing about nigeria because as far as I was concerned, I had already said as much as I needed to say about nigeria (with regards to the matter under discussion).

The last 4 paragraphs of my original post could also be read in reference to events and personalities in nigerian politics.

To answer your last question, I ask you this : what does "REPRESENTATIVE democracy" mean to you? It is an idea that pre-dates the intervention in African affairs by 'whites'. Did you know this?

I ask because I would like to know if you are aware of the original idea behind the thing now called "representative democracy".

-------------------------

i replied with this: (admitetdly i now realize was in the wrong place)
please remeber this:

"Now, since there is nothing I stated above that a well-informed person like yourself should not already know, I would ask you to bring foward what you know that makes you think nigeria has no credibility in African affairs. What information (or direct knowledge) is this opinion based on?"
-----------
then you would probably be able to answe this:

"Why did you repost the bit about nigeria?"

"In my response to you, I said nothing about nigeria because as far as I was concerned, I had already said as much as I needed to say about nigeria (with regards to the matter under discussion)."
-------------------------------------

and this is your reply:

Without doubt, you are a lunatic. You ask me to move on to another topic while you contaminate a thread that I initiated with the contents of your filthy perforated brain... Now, where is the sense in that?

I asked what the HELL you were talking about because I did not overstand why you would post your response on this particular spot. After all, the questions you pretend you are dealing with are further down the line. Why retreat back up here? Is it so you can disguise your out-of-context quoting?

I have previously made a correct identification of the sort of dishonest person you are. You are incapable of reasoning in a straight-forward manner. See, my biases are not hidden. I present them without disguise because they are justified. You on the other hand, can find no logical explanation for the confusion that rules your mind.

Know your limitations my 'friend' : intellectually, you are no different from a house naygrow. Which is why you are so proud of your prospective massas degree.

This is my last word to you, since it is plain to see now that you are an incorrigible hypocrite and a dishonest simpleton.
----------------------------------------------
quite telling

Messages In This Thread

The 'charles taylor' gambit
Eja -- Thursday, 30 March 2006, at 5:15 a.m.
Powerful!!!
discipleofthenile -- Thursday, 30 March 2006, at 7:40 a.m.
Re: The 'charles taylor' gambit
rasi -- Thursday, 30 March 2006, at 10:33 a.m.
Re: The 'charles taylor' gambit
Eja -- Thursday, 30 March 2006, at 11:29 a.m.
Re: The 'charles taylor' gambit *LINK*
rasi -- Thursday, 30 March 2006, at 12:55 p.m.
Re: The 'charles taylor' gambit
rasi -- Thursday, 30 March 2006, at 4:43 p.m.
Make sense (if you can)
Eja -- Thursday, 30 March 2006, at 5:28 p.m.
Re: Make sense (if you can)
rasi -- Thursday, 30 March 2006, at 5:41 p.m.
Re: Make sense (if you can)
Eja -- Thursday, 30 March 2006, at 6:07 p.m.
Re: Make sense (if you can)
rasi -- Thursday, 30 March 2006, at 6:14 p.m.
Re: Clarifcation
rasi -- Thursday, 30 March 2006, at 6:23 p.m.
Re: The 'charles taylor' gambit
selassielive -- Thursday, 30 March 2006, at 11:12 a.m.
Re: The 'charles taylor' gambit
Eja -- Thursday, 30 March 2006, at 12:19 p.m.
Re: The 'charles taylor' gambit *LINK*
rasi -- Thursday, 30 March 2006, at 1:03 p.m.
Re: The 'charles taylor' gambit
selassielive -- Thursday, 30 March 2006, at 12:42 p.m.
Re: The 'charles taylor' gambit
rasi -- Thursday, 30 March 2006, at 12:56 p.m.
Re: The 'charles taylor' gambit
selassielive -- Thursday, 30 March 2006, at 1:13 p.m.
Re: The 'charles taylor' gambit
rasi -- Thursday, 30 March 2006, at 1:28 p.m.
Re: The 'charles taylor' gambit
selassielive -- Thursday, 30 March 2006, at 2:17 p.m.
Re: The 'charles taylor' gambit
rasi -- Thursday, 30 March 2006, at 2:39 p.m.
Re: The 'charles taylor' gambit
selassielive -- Thursday, 30 March 2006, at 2:56 p.m.
Re: The 'charles taylor' gambit
Eja -- Thursday, 30 March 2006, at 2:43 p.m.
Re: The 'charles taylor' gambit *LINK*
rasi -- Thursday, 30 March 2006, at 3:11 p.m.
Re: The 'charles taylor' gambit
Eja -- Thursday, 30 March 2006, at 4:15 p.m.
Re: The 'charles taylor' gambit
PatriotWarrior -- Thursday, 30 March 2006, at 2:43 p.m.

[ View Thread ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

Rastafari Speaks Archive is maintained by Administrator with RastafariSpeaks.com 5.12.

FAIR USE NOTICE:
This site may at times contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml


Copyright © 2003-2009 RastafariSpeaks.com & AfricaSpeaks.com