| Homepage | Howcomyoucom | RaceandHistory | RootsWomen | Trinicenter |
 |
 |
 |
| ARCHIVE HOME | MESSAGE BOARD | REASONING FORUM | ARTICLES | ARCHIVES |
|
| |
Re: "lucifer segregated state of mind"?
Posted By: seshatasefekht In Response To: Re: "lucifer segregated state of mind"? (rasdavid simmonds)
Date: Wednesday, 15 February 2006, at 3:47 p.m.
peace and hotep,
rasdavids simmonds, when you state:
"black lucifers were living amongst rasta children before the white ones came",
are you saying that those two alleged supremacist got together and agreed to carry out our historic tragedy? which "lucifer" was superior, the black or the 'white' one. was the 'black' lucifer offered some thing from its 'white' counterpoint? which lucifer succeeded in dominating the world? the black one or the 'white' one?
rasdavids simmonds, also, when you state:
"if they were'nt how could it be so easy for the sellers to take sides with the buyers?",
please remember, the institution of slavery brought into the amoricas is kkknown as
THE PECULIAR INSTITUTION........
.....rasdavids simmonds, do you overstand what is meant by 'peculiar institution'.
in chancellor willian's 'the destruction of african civilization', it is well documented that africans have always been complicitous in our own destruction but our complicity withe indo-european oedipal complexes stops now.
indo-europeans in south africa call themselves african, like indo-europeans in amorica call themselves amoricans. they are not counter-racist.
DO INDO-EUROPEANS IN CHINA REFER TO THEMSELVES AS CHINESE? NO. why not?
the chinese will not consider themselves a mis-educated and conquered people. is this the fault of the yellow lucifer? should the alleged black and 'white' lucifer double team the alleged yellow one.
rasdavids simmonds, do you have a positive and negative side? which rules...?
freedomisahapislave
| |
Rastafari Speaks Archive is maintained by Administrator with RastafariSpeaks.com 5.12.
 FAIR USE NOTICE: This site may at times contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml |