Re: Genocide, Group-Defense and the Historical Con
Posted By: seshatasefekht In Response To: Re: Genocide, Group-Defense and the Historical Con (sense)
Date: Friday, 28 October 2005, at 12:53 p.m.
In Response To: Re: Genocide, Group-Defense and the Historical Con (sense)
two basic problems among the people of the known universe:
1. lack of knowledge and understanding of the reason for existence, and/or for non-existence.
2. racism (white supremacy).
every 'problem'among the people of the known universe can, today, be traced to:
1. a lack of knowledge and understanding of the reason for existence and/or non-existence, compounded by and promoted by
2. the practice of racism(white supremacy).
this is true in all areas of activity among people, including economics, education, entertainment, labor, law, politics, religion, sex, and war.
two basic "classes" of people in the know universe:
1. the powerful 'class'(white supremacist)
2. the powerless 'class'( all non-white people, AND those white people who are not white supremacists)
since the establishment of white supremacy(racism)among the people of the known universe, the terms 'upper class', have become so meaningless that to use such terms to describe any people does not promote justice, but serves only to promote great confusion.
it is therefore best not to use such terms to describe any people now in existence int the known universe.
under white supremacy, and/or, as long as white supremacy exists, the best and most accurate way to describe people by using the category of 'class' is to describe their power relationship to each other,
by so doing, all white people who practice white supremacy(racism) must be recognised as the only people in the known universe who are the 'powerful class".
all non-white people, being subject to the 'powerful class' are, therefore, the 'powerless class'.
in addition, those white persons who do not practice white supremacy are also the 'powerless class'. thes white people who do not practice white supremacy are not subject to the white supremacists ('the powerful class'). the fact that no white person is subject to white supremacy(racism) greatly confuses many non-white people. THE FACT THAT NO WHITE PERSON IS SUBJECT TO WHITE SUPREMACY(RACISM) GREATLY CONFUSES MANY NON-WHITE PEOPLE.
no white person is subject to white supremacy. it is possible, however, for a white person to be 'powerless' to do anything that is effective against the practice of white supremacy. some examples of such persons are white people who are 'infantile', and/or, who are so 'senile' in mind and body that they are completely dependent on others for all of their care, and are completely incapable' of doing harm to others.
since all of the white people who practice white supremacy are 'the powerful class', it generally serves no useful purpose for a non-white person to worry about which individual white person is 'more powerful' than another within that class. a white supremacist is a white supremacist(powerful person).
how one white supremacist relates to another white supremacist at any particular monent should be of no major concern to a non-white person, since all white supremacists are committed to the practice of racism (white supremacy).
in any event, the white supremacists, are 'smarter' than many other white supremacists, will, in all matters involving the maintenance of white supremacy, give effective support to those who are 'not so smart'.
THIS GUARANTEES THAT ALL PEOPLE CLASSIFIED AS 'WHITE' ARE AUTOMATICALLY 'ENTITLED' TO RECEIVE BENEFITS SPECIAL ONLY TO PEOPLE CLASSIFIED AS 'WHITE' IN A WORLD SOCIO-MATERIAL SYSTEM DOMINATED BY WHITE SUPREMACISTS(THE POWERFUL CLASS).
also, the very existence of white supremacy(racism) automatically eliminates the possibility of any non-white person being so-called 'upper-class' or 'middle-class'. how can they be? if they are 'upper-class', or 'midddle class', 'upper' or 'middle' of what----as compared to what? as compared to who? certainly not white people, and definitely not white supremacist.
though all non-white people are functional 'lower-class'---meaning they are all 'lower' in comparison to the white people of the known univer---it is better not to say that they are 'lower-class'. to do so would be to promote questions regarding the confusing terms 'upper-class' or 'middle-class'. therefore, in referring to the 'class' status of all non-white people, it is better to that they ar 'the powerless class'.
as long as white supremacy exists, it is incorrect for any non-white person to pretend that he or she is any 'class' or person other than 'the powerless class'. ----neely fuller jr
Messages In This Thread
Rastafari Speaks Archive is maintained by Administrator with RastafariSpeaks.com 5.12.
FAIR USE NOTICE:
This site may at times contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml