HomepageHowcomyoucomRaceandHistoryRootsWomenTrinicenter
Homepage
Rastafari Speaks Archive
Buy Books
ARCHIVE HOMEMESSAGE BOARDREASONING FORUMARTICLESARCHIVES

Read Only : Rastafari Speaks Reasoning Archives

[ View Thread ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

so did any one answer your question

Posted By: seshatasefekht
Date: Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 2:41 p.m.

In Response To: Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O (Priest Asukile Adigun Adofo)

peace and hotep,

Priest Asukile Adigun Adofo, so did any one answer your question appropriately. is the emperor from a real lineage or a mythical allegory lineage is akin to asking whether the same applies to the queen of england. at one time england was lifted up like babel but what was lifted up is brought low eventually. all rastafarians will not follow the same errors. some will learn from the past and move into the future.

Priest Asukile Adigun Adofo, when you state:

"I'm not being funny but the Christians have use this same speech to shake our faith and make us denounce the Emperor as the Almighty, Jah is Spirit Flesh and Blood, i can take anything the human nature of the creator may put forward in flesh, so this speech does not shake my faith, for without Haile Selassie I the Crowned Emperor of Ethiopia, the Rastafari Movement as no standard bearer, and through the divinity of His Royal Majesty, these people with locks on their head have grown in power, yes the outcast have grown in power.

Yes calling the Emperor Messiah Like Yeshua is one thing, calling him the Almighty is another, the Messiah is not necessarily the Almighty, and many Rasses now are revealing that they only have ever seen the Emperor as the Messiah, well I and them are Different, the Emperor is the Almighty WITHOUT APOLOGY.",

please remember humpty-dumpty and the legacy of babel. gutter religion appear at various times to get ones out of destitute situations. gutter religions come and go while people continue to backslide into more gutters. all of the worlds religions are made into gutter religions. we should hope that rastafari avoids the gutter because haile selassie would have never advocated the use of h.i.m's image to promote more of the same babylon system. h.i.m's image to promote more backsliding?

rastafari is not a cult.

freedomisahapislave

freedomisahapislave

Messages In This Thread

THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE OF H
Priest Asukile Adigun Adofo -- Monday, 3 October 2005, at 8:42 a.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
rob_afreeka -- Monday, 3 October 2005, at 9:25 a.m.
Africa doesn't need biblical justification
three_sixty -- Monday, 3 October 2005, at 10:14 a.m.
Re: Africa doesn't need biblical justification
three_sixty -- Monday, 3 October 2005, at 10:28 a.m.
Re: Africa doesn't need biblical justification
sabbah -- Monday, 3 October 2005, at 11:08 a.m.
Re: Africa doesn't need biblical justification
three_sixty -- Monday, 3 October 2005, at 2:43 p.m.
Re: Africa doesn't need biblical justification
Masimba Musodza -- Monday, 3 October 2005, at 3:16 p.m.
hyksos introduced the chariot into warfare *NM*
seshatasefekht -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 9:04 a.m.
Re: Africa doesn't need biblical justification
sabbah -- Monday, 3 October 2005, at 4:01 p.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
selassielive -- Monday, 3 October 2005, at 11:15 a.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
Fyahman -- Monday, 3 October 2005, at 11:53 a.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
Priest Asukile Adigun Adofo -- Monday, 3 October 2005, at 2:02 p.m.
correction answered not asked *NM*
Priest Asukile Adigun Adofo -- Monday, 3 October 2005, at 6:52 p.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
Masimba Musodza -- Monday, 3 October 2005, at 3:19 p.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
Priest Asukile Adigun Adofo -- Monday, 3 October 2005, at 6:37 p.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
selassielive -- Tuesday, 4 October 2005, at 10:23 a.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O *LINK*
blessedflames -- Tuesday, 4 October 2005, at 11:15 a.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
selassielive -- Tuesday, 4 October 2005, at 11:34 a.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
blessedflames -- Tuesday, 4 October 2005, at 12:10 p.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
selassielive -- Tuesday, 4 October 2005, at 2:49 p.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
blessedflames -- Tuesday, 4 October 2005, at 3:38 p.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
selassielive -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 8:27 a.m.
Re: SELASSIELIVE
blessedflames -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 11:43 a.m.
Re: BLESSEDFLAMES
selassielive -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 2:15 p.m.
Re: BLESSEDFLAMES
blessedflames -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 3:43 p.m.
Re: BLESSEDFLAMES
seshatasefekht -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 4:08 p.m.
Re: BLESSEDFLAMES
blessedflames -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 4:28 p.m.
Re: BLESSEDFLAMES
seshatasefekht -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 4:38 p.m.
Re: BLESSEDFLAMES
blessedflames -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 4:47 p.m.
FLAME ON then. *NM*
seshatasefekht -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 5:12 p.m.
Re: BLESSEDFLAMES..ubermensch or herd?
selassielive -- Thursday, 6 October 2005, at 10:36 a.m.
Re: BLESSEDFLAMES..ubermensch or herd?
blessedflames -- Thursday, 6 October 2005, at 11:28 a.m.
what happens when refuse to see.......oedipus rex *NM*
seshatasefekht -- Thursday, 6 October 2005, at 11:38 a.m.
Re: BLESSEDFLAMES
blessedflames -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 3:55 p.m.
COULDNT BE MORE RIGHT!!!!!!!!!!
blessedflames -- Tuesday, 4 October 2005, at 5:05 p.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
Masimba Musodza -- Monday, 3 October 2005, at 3:08 p.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
three_sixty -- Tuesday, 4 October 2005, at 9:39 a.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
Priest Asukile Adigun Adofo -- Tuesday, 4 October 2005, at 10:58 a.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
three_sixty -- Tuesday, 4 October 2005, at 11:31 a.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
Priest Asukile Adigun Adofo -- Tuesday, 4 October 2005, at 12:12 p.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
three_sixty -- Tuesday, 4 October 2005, at 12:43 p.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
selassielive -- Tuesday, 4 October 2005, at 2:31 p.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
Priest Asukile Adigun Adofo -- Tuesday, 4 October 2005, at 3:34 p.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
three_sixty -- Tuesday, 4 October 2005, at 3:57 p.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
rob_afreeka -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 5:40 a.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
three_sixty -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 8:51 a.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
rob_afreeka -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 9:20 a.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
selassielive -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 10:00 a.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
rob_afreeka -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 10:55 a.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
selassielive -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 11:01 a.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
seshatasefekht -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 11:14 a.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
rasdavid simmonds -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 11:04 a.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
rasdavid simmonds -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 11:18 a.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
rob_afreeka -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 11:42 a.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
Priest Asukile Adigun Adofo -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 2:04 p.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
selassielive -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 2:30 p.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
blessedflames -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 3:58 p.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
sabbah -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 4:09 p.m.
yes *NM*
seshatasefekht -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 4:15 p.m.
so did any one answer your question
seshatasefekht -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 2:41 p.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
blessedflames -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 3:52 p.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
three_sixty -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 1:57 p.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
rob_afreeka -- Thursday, 6 October 2005, at 4:03 a.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
three_sixty -- Thursday, 6 October 2005, at 8:44 a.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
rob_afreeka -- Thursday, 6 October 2005, at 8:59 a.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
three_sixty -- Tuesday, 4 October 2005, at 11:35 a.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
seshatasefekht -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 11:00 a.m.
question sesha
sabbah -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 11:54 a.m.
Re: question sesha
seshatasefekht -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 12:51 p.m.
Re: question sesha
sabbah -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 1:03 p.m.
that would be pre-talmudic?
sabbah -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 1:10 p.m.
Re: that would be pre-talmudic?
seshatasefekht -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 1:43 p.m.
Re: that would be pre-talmudic?
sabbah -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 2:10 p.m.
i should also ask......
sabbah -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 2:37 p.m.
Re: that would be pre-talmudic?
seshatasefekht -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 3:18 p.m.
Re: that would be pre-talmudic?
sabbah -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 3:23 p.m.
Re: that would be pre-talmudic?
selassielive -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 1:50 p.m.
Re: that would be pre-talmudic?
sabbah -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 1:54 p.m.
Re: question sesha
seshatasefekht -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 1:35 p.m.
how the grinch stole krst-x *NM* *LINK*
seshatasefekht -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 2:12 p.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
Sankhkara Adisa -- Tuesday, 11 October 2005, at 2:48 p.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
Ras Heru -- Tuesday, 11 October 2005, at 3:45 p.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
Priest Asukile Adigun Adofo -- Tuesday, 11 October 2005, at 7:04 p.m.
LOL
Ras Heru -- Wednesday, 12 October 2005, at 1:28 p.m.

[ View Thread ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

Rastafari Speaks Archive is maintained by Administrator with RastafariSpeaks.com 5.12.

FAIR USE NOTICE:
This site may at times contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml


Copyright © 2003-2009 RastafariSpeaks.com & AfricaSpeaks.com