HomepageHowcomyoucomRaceandHistoryRootsWomenTrinicenter
Homepage
Rastafari Speaks Archive
Buy Books
ARCHIVE HOMEMESSAGE BOARDREASONING FORUMARTICLESARCHIVES

Read Only : Rastafari Speaks Reasoning Archives

[ View Thread ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

Re: Africa doesn't need biblical justification

Posted By: three_sixty
Date: Monday, 3 October 2005, at 10:28 a.m.

In Response To: Africa doesn't need biblical justification (three_sixty)

The Khoikhoi ("people people" or "real people") or Khoi were a division of the Khoisan ethnic group of south-western Africa, closely related to the Bushmen (San in the Khoi language). Khoikhoi is sometimes spelt KhoeKhoe. At the time of the arrival of white settlers in 1652 the Khoikhoi had lived in southern Africa for about 30,000 years, and practised extensive pastoral agriculture in the Cape region.

- source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khoikhoi

Messages In This Thread

THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE OF H
Priest Asukile Adigun Adofo -- Monday, 3 October 2005, at 8:42 a.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
rob_afreeka -- Monday, 3 October 2005, at 9:25 a.m.
Africa doesn't need biblical justification
three_sixty -- Monday, 3 October 2005, at 10:14 a.m.
Re: Africa doesn't need biblical justification
three_sixty -- Monday, 3 October 2005, at 10:28 a.m.
Re: Africa doesn't need biblical justification
sabbah -- Monday, 3 October 2005, at 11:08 a.m.
Re: Africa doesn't need biblical justification
three_sixty -- Monday, 3 October 2005, at 2:43 p.m.
Re: Africa doesn't need biblical justification
Masimba Musodza -- Monday, 3 October 2005, at 3:16 p.m.
hyksos introduced the chariot into warfare *NM*
seshatasefekht -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 9:04 a.m.
Re: Africa doesn't need biblical justification
sabbah -- Monday, 3 October 2005, at 4:01 p.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
selassielive -- Monday, 3 October 2005, at 11:15 a.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
Fyahman -- Monday, 3 October 2005, at 11:53 a.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
Priest Asukile Adigun Adofo -- Monday, 3 October 2005, at 2:02 p.m.
correction answered not asked *NM*
Priest Asukile Adigun Adofo -- Monday, 3 October 2005, at 6:52 p.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
Masimba Musodza -- Monday, 3 October 2005, at 3:19 p.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
Priest Asukile Adigun Adofo -- Monday, 3 October 2005, at 6:37 p.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
selassielive -- Tuesday, 4 October 2005, at 10:23 a.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O *LINK*
blessedflames -- Tuesday, 4 October 2005, at 11:15 a.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
selassielive -- Tuesday, 4 October 2005, at 11:34 a.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
blessedflames -- Tuesday, 4 October 2005, at 12:10 p.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
selassielive -- Tuesday, 4 October 2005, at 2:49 p.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
blessedflames -- Tuesday, 4 October 2005, at 3:38 p.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
selassielive -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 8:27 a.m.
Re: SELASSIELIVE
blessedflames -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 11:43 a.m.
Re: BLESSEDFLAMES
selassielive -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 2:15 p.m.
Re: BLESSEDFLAMES
blessedflames -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 3:43 p.m.
Re: BLESSEDFLAMES
seshatasefekht -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 4:08 p.m.
Re: BLESSEDFLAMES
blessedflames -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 4:28 p.m.
Re: BLESSEDFLAMES
seshatasefekht -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 4:38 p.m.
Re: BLESSEDFLAMES
blessedflames -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 4:47 p.m.
FLAME ON then. *NM*
seshatasefekht -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 5:12 p.m.
Re: BLESSEDFLAMES..ubermensch or herd?
selassielive -- Thursday, 6 October 2005, at 10:36 a.m.
Re: BLESSEDFLAMES..ubermensch or herd?
blessedflames -- Thursday, 6 October 2005, at 11:28 a.m.
what happens when refuse to see.......oedipus rex *NM*
seshatasefekht -- Thursday, 6 October 2005, at 11:38 a.m.
Re: BLESSEDFLAMES
blessedflames -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 3:55 p.m.
COULDNT BE MORE RIGHT!!!!!!!!!!
blessedflames -- Tuesday, 4 October 2005, at 5:05 p.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
Masimba Musodza -- Monday, 3 October 2005, at 3:08 p.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
three_sixty -- Tuesday, 4 October 2005, at 9:39 a.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
Priest Asukile Adigun Adofo -- Tuesday, 4 October 2005, at 10:58 a.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
three_sixty -- Tuesday, 4 October 2005, at 11:31 a.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
Priest Asukile Adigun Adofo -- Tuesday, 4 October 2005, at 12:12 p.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
three_sixty -- Tuesday, 4 October 2005, at 12:43 p.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
selassielive -- Tuesday, 4 October 2005, at 2:31 p.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
Priest Asukile Adigun Adofo -- Tuesday, 4 October 2005, at 3:34 p.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
three_sixty -- Tuesday, 4 October 2005, at 3:57 p.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
rob_afreeka -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 5:40 a.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
three_sixty -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 8:51 a.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
rob_afreeka -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 9:20 a.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
selassielive -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 10:00 a.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
rob_afreeka -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 10:55 a.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
selassielive -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 11:01 a.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
seshatasefekht -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 11:14 a.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
rasdavid simmonds -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 11:04 a.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
rasdavid simmonds -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 11:18 a.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
rob_afreeka -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 11:42 a.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
Priest Asukile Adigun Adofo -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 2:04 p.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
selassielive -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 2:30 p.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
blessedflames -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 3:58 p.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
sabbah -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 4:09 p.m.
yes *NM*
seshatasefekht -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 4:15 p.m.
so did any one answer your question
seshatasefekht -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 2:41 p.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
blessedflames -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 3:52 p.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
three_sixty -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 1:57 p.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
rob_afreeka -- Thursday, 6 October 2005, at 4:03 a.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
three_sixty -- Thursday, 6 October 2005, at 8:44 a.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
rob_afreeka -- Thursday, 6 October 2005, at 8:59 a.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
three_sixty -- Tuesday, 4 October 2005, at 11:35 a.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
seshatasefekht -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 11:00 a.m.
question sesha
sabbah -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 11:54 a.m.
Re: question sesha
seshatasefekht -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 12:51 p.m.
Re: question sesha
sabbah -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 1:03 p.m.
that would be pre-talmudic?
sabbah -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 1:10 p.m.
Re: that would be pre-talmudic?
seshatasefekht -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 1:43 p.m.
Re: that would be pre-talmudic?
sabbah -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 2:10 p.m.
i should also ask......
sabbah -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 2:37 p.m.
Re: that would be pre-talmudic?
seshatasefekht -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 3:18 p.m.
Re: that would be pre-talmudic?
sabbah -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 3:23 p.m.
Re: that would be pre-talmudic?
selassielive -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 1:50 p.m.
Re: that would be pre-talmudic?
sabbah -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 1:54 p.m.
Re: question sesha
seshatasefekht -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 1:35 p.m.
how the grinch stole krst-x *NM* *LINK*
seshatasefekht -- Wednesday, 5 October 2005, at 2:12 p.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
Sankhkara Adisa -- Tuesday, 11 October 2005, at 2:48 p.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
Ras Heru -- Tuesday, 11 October 2005, at 3:45 p.m.
Re: THE BOOK OF THE DEAD DOES NOT CLAIM THE LINE O
Priest Asukile Adigun Adofo -- Tuesday, 11 October 2005, at 7:04 p.m.
LOL
Ras Heru -- Wednesday, 12 October 2005, at 1:28 p.m.

[ View Thread ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

Rastafari Speaks Archive is maintained by Administrator with RastafariSpeaks.com 5.12.

FAIR USE NOTICE:
This site may at times contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

Copyright © 2003-2009 RastafariSpeaks.com & AfricaSpeaks.com