Selassielive, Eja, Ras Heru:
power to your sights and words, BUT...

Not that I can dispute the cipher/zero statements, it is just that those statements cannot be proven.

So in essence, this has become a "faith-based" reasoning. The difference being that (even though I am not claiming that I am presenting absolute truth), my argument concerning ONE and ONE is proven throughout the entire (known) Universe, without question or exception...and since "as above so below" is an accepted premise/overstanding, why would I not apply that to Divinity?

I appreciate the input/views/sights definitely.

However, being a truth detective, I have a blindfold on and hold the scales of truth. The scales of Ma'at (balance/order/truth/justice) represents a equalization which MUST have something measured against something. So what this suggests is that even Ma'athematics (as we call it) is dependent upon NOT just one value, but another...that is why they are called equations.

So you must admit (if you truly absorb my sights) that my claims are supported by 2 strong points:
1. evidence as supported by all creation/reality
2. the overstanding "as above, so below"

SO what I am saying is that I cannot disprove your words, but you cannot prove them neither. So we might as well be Panho and Steven M discussing the divinity of Jesus.

Again, not disputing, just identifying what has been presented in opposition of my original post as rhetoric and conjecture.

However, very thought-provoking. But I am not here to exercise my Mind, I am here to de-cipher the truth.

We ALL agree that Nature is the evidence/record of Jah. Have I not presented Truth as evidenced by seen Nature? And if we leave open the "mystery" of the unseen, are we not self-exploiting what we cannot grasp and are now contriving "spooky" tales to fill the void, just like the drop-outs are doing to the masses?