|
*******I think the confusion lies in you interpreting his usage of "Babylon" to mean the ancient kingdom of Babylon when I think he is using it in the context of "white supremist system". *******
nahh, his confusion does not lie. It tells the precise truth about where his head is.
You could have said "duuhhh, ummm, not that Babylon". But you responded in a tactful manner. I cannot, however. Especially towards someone who apparently has a seat on the application board for those seeking membership into Rasta.
Nimrod? Egyptology?
First he offends and insults, then he decides to toss "patoisy ebonics" around as if it is entertaining and cunning, (which is was not) and then proceeds to talk about the wrong Babylon...AND THEN offers to 'debate'.
Debate?!?! ever heard of "reasoning".
Hey Still marred, nice intro.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site may at times contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml |