peace and hotep,

discipleofthenile, when you state:

"if there was not so much CnP'ing and reasoning on this subject, perhaps overstandings would arise.",

why would any ones object to as much "CnP'ing" as possible?

what are the statutes of limitation regarding "CnP'ing"?

how about a little bit of "CnP'ing"?

what about links to pages of "CnP'ing"?

discipleofthenile, before i began "CnP'ing", never before "CnP'ing"--ed excerpts from the works of neely fuller jr or frances cress welsing, no ones did. no ones offered to even go into depth withe either. there are still many who are unfamiliar withe their collective works. should we wait for ones to afford access to constructive programs or provide those programs to the ones in need of them.

discipleofthenile, i remember eja's suggestion a while back. eja was soliciting others to participate withe him in reproducing articles for easy distribution to ones withe out access to rastaspeaks or the internet.

do ones remember? i noted that decision to circulate rastaspeaks is left to the admins of theses forums. what became of "eja's premise" distributing articles from rastaspeaks?

wouldn't that entail a lot of "CnP'ing"?.............................

how does my distribution of the solutions of others contradict "eja's premise"?

discipleofthenile, the language of the works of neely fuller jr. are designed to produce justice. no ones can be implicated by "patriot acts" by circulating the codified works of neely fuller jr........

but if ones create a document which could be misconstrued as 'seditious' one may end up in Guantánamo Bay.

this is the reason i asked you and eja about your own :

'solutions to problems. neither one of you have submitted anything comparable to the authors i cited. yet, as i DEMONstrated------ "eja's premise".

does any ones remember "eja's premise". it should be archived.

freedomisahapislave