thankhs for the knowledge

I think we are getting close.
My only problem with your statement of:

["everything is absolute truth so nothing is absolute truth"]

is that to me, that is the same as saying there must be "imbalance" in order to counter "balance". But balance itself is already the "zero sum" of two counter balances, so that is why it is difficult for me to see "nothing" as the counter-balance to "everything".

in other words:
EVERYTHING is already a reference to balance (all inclusive)

Balance is already a reference to balance (left side/right side...all inclusive)

So assuming that "nothing" is the counterbalance to "everything" is just like assuming that "imbalance" is the counterbalance to "balance" (Ma'at).

Now truthfully, I can see theoretic truth to "nothing is absolute truth" if "nothing" was possible/realistic. But there is no such thing as nothingness...remember I am refering to "everything that is 'created'", which is ALL matter and ALL energy. And there is no such reality as "absolute vacuum" and "absolute zero". Which means that matter/energy is everywhere.

The acceptance/overstanding of the fact about absolute zero and absolute vacuum is very significant in my premise. If that is not accepted, we will definitely continue to not sight together on this.

To get my point across fully is why we had such a "spat" a while ago on "matter of fact". The premise of my whole sightings/argument is the fact that matter and energy are everywhere, which means omnipresent.

I bet you if we pinpoint exactly what it is that is in disagreement, we will see i-2-i.

Do you sight that absolute zero and absolute vacuums are not existent? This must be clarified in order to ladder.

-respects