Something I have been thinking in regards to grasping absolute truth is why make it an ALL or NOTHING concept? Why limit one's ability there to say "if" one can only grasp a "piece" of the truth then the rest is unattainable? In other words, if, throughout my lifetime, I am able to open my self up to experience a variety of absolute truths, then it would stand to reason that I can therefore connect with a conscious stream of absolute truths right where I am, wherever I am, and thus do not have to wait till I "arrive" at some specific designation but rather it is available to me NOW.

Do we not host within our true selves the creative force of absolution? Are we not part and particle of the same? Why make it so complex by placing it in the realm of the unfanthomable and yolking it to high level mathmatical equations? If I choose to percieve absolute truth in that manner...then yes...it would be quite difficult to grasp and I could spin through eternity trying to figure it out.

Simply put...is not absolute truth revealed every time one experiences a common universal truth? It corroberates the idea "when you hear it (truth) you know it." Universal experience thus provides the opportunity to grasp absolute truth that is constant and is a revelation of the creative force that is all around, above, below and exists within. We therefore do not need to rely on complex mathmatical equations to figure it out...(thanks be) but rather open our true selves up to a wide range of experiences in order "to know."

Universal experience = to know = absolute truth.

The mind and ego in my view is what limits one's ability to grasp a very simple equation of 1+ 1 = 2