Greetings Kween

-Who is the "our" you are referring to?
Humanity or Afrikans?

I do not see a difference. Is there a discernible difference between the essence of being African and the essence of being non-African? Yes.

******************************
A discernable difference between the essence of being...? Does the I know that humans share 99.9% of common genes. It is the 0.1% that account for hair color, texture, skin color, eye color, predispostions to certain ailments, etc.

I dont sight how discernible 0.1% is compared to 99.9%. This is from a physical perspective though. Maybe it is the 0.1% that is responsible for the barbarism of certain people. I am not a genetics but I do know that humans have more in common than uncommon.

*******************

-I sight the perfection of man while in triple stage darkness of the womb...but what happens once we are born into this world of illusion?

Whose illusion is it? No man is an island. The air you breathe in was once the breath of another, and the same sun that warms your face warms the entire planet. Proximity is the only variable between your illusion/reality and mine.

**********************
We do not breath recycled air from other people. We breath the oxygen that is emitted from plants. Proximity is very important when it come to reality/illusions of reality. 3 people can see the same accident but have 3 different perspectives. Is all three the truthful view? which are the illusions? are they all illusions?

**********************

An infant knows nothing of morality, morality is strictly a cultural value judgment. He knows nothing of Tao or Buddha, but he knows intuitively consequences. Therefore, I repeat: There is no original intent. You choose to name good and evil, balance and imbalance, but those are quantitative terms used to measure the effects/manifestations/consequences of good and evil. If you choose to deny your essence you will ultimately find yourself physically out of balance. To borrow a quote from Eja: “We seek Ire (Good) and Ire seeks us because THAT is the natural state of affairs.”

*****************

I dont choose to name good and evil as balance and imbalance. I think good and evil are morality based judgements while balance and imbalance are not.

A child learns from his environment. His intent is survival. He learns what he thinks need to be done to ensure his survival from the ones around him. This is where the indoctrination of religion usually comes into play.

*********************

-Where do we learn of this good and evil?
Our inner teacher/moral conscience?
Nature or nurture?

One has no need to learn goodness it is the natural state of being. One learns evil through Cause and effect, action and re-action, source and manifestation. It is our overall choices/responses that produce and maintain the spectre of evil in this realm.

**************
"Goodness" is a relative term. What is deemed good for one may be disasterous for another.

For example, a brush fire is not good for the people, nor animals who have homes in the path of the fire but it is good for the farmers because it makes the soil suitable for growing crops.

Evil is learned by cause and effect just as goodness is.

If you dont know goodness, how could you perceive of "no-goodness/evil"?

The consequences of our actions are what people called either "good" results or "evil" results according to how it effects them.

Peace