I am looking in to it. These blood-drinking sort are a faction of the Merovingians- who have found new fame through the novel The Da Vinci Code. What I found intriguing is that while they are clearly for Aryan supremacy, they cite the Black Madonna statues of France as proof of the purpoted Jesus bloodline. The claim is that they were not originally statues of the Virgin or Isis as is widely asserted, but of Sarah, daughter of Jesus and Mary Magdalene.
Another question; what then of those "blacks trapped in white skins", to borrow a Zimbabwean euphemism for the albinos. I know in many parts of my country they are shunned and despised. Being clearly melanin-challenged, would they then be considered inferior?
And as you probably know, Africans represent many shades of Black going in to brown. I once worked with a chap I first took for a white person- the only dark thing about him was his hair. But he was a Berber, and he insisted he was as Black as me because we are both Africans. I know that the Berber, although Muslim, resent being Arabicised and regard North African Arabs as "foreigners". West Africans tend to be darker than us Southern Africans ( because of the Khoisan blood in us), then you have the peoples of the Horn of Africa. Does this mean then that we are to have a reverse of the catse system?
FAIR USE NOTICE:
This site may at times contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml