"now sistren i dont agree your k/q would find unu guily of anything if its not true. unless unu did it before and gave the k/q reason to feel so. and how can unu be found guilty if your not. they can only think so. there is nothing wrong being there for a b/s in need. if its "clear cut"like that. but some times it isnt. some use it as a blindfold. IF UNU PLAYING HIDE AND MEET ME ROUND THE CORNER AND CANT BE B/S IN FRONT OF YOUR K/Q THEN UNU NOT TRUE B/S SEEN.."
so you sayin that you got your eyes so shut dat you no know sey when you have a king n you have a bredren that your 'intimate' with dat your king is going to see that intimacy as form of cheatin? even look at the word you chose tuh use 'intimate', in-to-mate, even if it no a physical matin, matin a still gwan. bredren n sistren no need tuh be guilty of physical f.ckery, or even hidin as if dem were, tuh be seen as 'steppin out' in anotha way, when jealous/posessive love is the love you dealin with

"and seeing mommy and daddy with plenty different partners isnt true livily. its funny how people try to twist and turn things to fit what they want" true livity is found in righteous acts n thoughts. if one has more than one partner because of love and respect, and no simple lustful reasons, the pickney exposed to dem types of relationships will have a healthy overstanding of love. ini stance no about twistin n turnin - its about comin straight down every road, no partial, no hidin.