[if I misoverstood and it effected my reply tell I] I no think my wordin was wrong, I do believe dat an empress can have more than one partner. I stay with one king and only one king in this chapter in I life because dat what him need n SelassieI sent I to provide dat for now; dat no mean I deny the natural order of tings, only dat I go where SelassieI bring I.
Bless up

ok so you see it that a empress, can have more than one partner, in a man's case he can determine from he alone is with each empress, who his children are, but in the woman's case how does she know who fathered her child is this where SELASSIE I would lead you?

the woman is like unto a garden, if more than one gardener tend to her, and the owner don't see all of them, how is he going to know who did the job on his garden? i think equal rights should be upheld between man and woman, but how can you justify a woman having more than one partner, so procreation with more than one man is ok by you, from the spirit of Selassie I as you put it, brings you there.

i can't uphold that, another man sleeping with my Empress same time as me, making love as i do uplift that's carnal.

i don't think you relies what you are saying even though you say your wording was'nt wrong.

you have two Kings for example, you go to one of their houses, you have intercourse, you leave and go to the other kings house, you have intercourse with him, so you have had intercourse with your two kings in the same day, months after you become pregnant, the two kings will be wondering which one of them is the father.

do you see what i am saying, even if poligamy exist in the trod of Rastafari, it would'nt be in the order you see it as, and your interpretation of the natural order of things.

that said feel free to your opinion, but i see it carnal.

that said, KES ADOFO AS SPOKEN.