Much of the debate about Selassie’s views on Christianity has been available online for a long time, so if some have a problem with it, it may be because they do not agree with some of the things Selassie said and did. In that case they should feel free enough to simply say so. I am of the view that Selassie could not understand the effect of colonialism on Africans, and why some would have considered him their Saviour/God. I would not expect an Emperor to understand that. Admitting that one does not agree with his position on some things does not take away from the symbolic presence that he was.

The problem is that some people feel that to follow Selassie means to take everything literally, and suspend their own discerning ability.

Garvey and Selassie did not understand the context of dreadlocks, marijuana and so many things that were already taking place in the Caribbean before their time. I have respect for their efforts, but I do not agree with everything they did. Admitting these things does not diminish the contribution these people made to the development of Africans as well as others.

Having a more realistic view of these people (without demonizing them) can allow many to appreciate their own discerning abilities.